Claim review and reports
Auga shows evidence, not a verdict. Compliance is the deployer's conclusion.
In Claim review, a person adopts, rejects, retests or defers the compliance findings that the engine has made. The page also holds the Art. 86 reports. Guarded decisions that wait for a verdict are reviewed in Decision review.
Graded findings53 grade A · 1 B · 1 C
Waiting for review2in the Claim review inbox
Human reviews3added only, never changed
Ledger entries1,842each linked to the one before
Exports
Ranked risks
| Finding | Grade | Kind | Challenge tests | Predictions | Agent · field of work | Review |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| credit.score_source → credit.risk_score | A | harm | 3 of 3 | 4 of 4 | Bureau agent · data handling | |
| credit.risk_score → credit.decision | A | outcome | 3 of 3 | 4 of 4 | Policy agent · tool use | |
| credit.feed_batch_records → credit.score_source | A | harm | 2 of 2 | 3 of 3 | Bureau agent · data handling | adopted by Ava L. |
| credit.income_verified_ratio → credit.affordability_ratio | B | outcome | 2 of 3 | 2 of 2 | Income agent · data handling | adopted by Ava L. |
| credit.sanctions_list_version → credit.decision | C | outcome | 0 of 1 | 0 of 1 | KYC agent · data handling | adopted by Ava L. |
Review log
| When | Finding | Verdict | By |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 09:12 | credit.feed_batch_records → credit.score_source | adopt | Ava L. |
| 3 Nov 09:06 | credit.income_verified_ratio → credit.affordability_ratio | adopt | Ava L. |
| 3 Nov 08:51 | credit.sanctions_list_version → credit.decision | retest | Sam K. |
This is a static example. All figures are invented. Buttons and form fields do not work here.
How the evidence is protected
Entries are only added and never changed, and each entry is linked to the one before.
More exactly
The evidence is append-only and hash-chained.